Rigorous, source-verified research briefs in days, not months. Structured analysis of the academic literature, full source transparency, and unlimited follow-up questions.
Whether it's due diligence on a scientific claim, an evidence base for a strategy decision, or a literature review for a regulatory submission — you need answers from the research, and you need them fast.
6–18 months, $30k–$150k. Delivered long after the decision window has closed. Usually too academic to act on.
Fast but unverifiable. No source trail, no methodology, no way to know what was missed. Unacceptable for serious decisions.
Your team spends days reading papers and produces a subjective summary. No structured extraction, no reproducibility, no confidence scoring.
I combine AI-powered analysis with expert oversight to deliver research reports that are rigorous enough to cite and fast enough to use.
Every engagement delivers a complete evidence package, not just a summary.
1–2 pages. Numbered findings with evidence strength qualifiers. Clear bottom line. Written for people who need to act, not read.
Comprehensive analysis with APA citations, verified source quotes, credibility assessments, and areas of disagreement. Self-contained HTML with citation tooltips.
Every paper with 29 data columns: methodology, key claims, confidence scores, credibility tier, grounding coverage. CSV export for your own analysis.
Complete BibTeX and RIS reference files for all included papers. Import directly into Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote.
Every engagement includes ongoing consulting support — send me follow-up questions, ask me to test assumptions, and request visualisations of how papers connect.
Send me a question in plain English and get a sourced answer back quickly. Every response includes inline citations with verified quotes from specific papers. No waiting for a full new report — get answers as questions arise.
Ask me to filter by year, methodology, paper tier, or exclude individual studies — and I'll show you how the conclusions change. Answers questions like "does this finding hold if we remove the weaker studies?"
I provide visual network diagrams showing how papers cluster around shared findings. Papers are nodes, patterns are connections, and disagreements are visible fault lines.
Six engagement patterns, each designed for a different stage of your decision-making process. Every engagement includes ongoing consulting support for follow-up questions and deeper exploration.
"What does the evidence look like?"
Fast scoping of the research landscape. Ideal for proposals, feasibility checks, and initial briefings.
"Build me a structured evidence base."
Thorough extraction and full-text analysis. Produces the CSV evidence table your analysts can work with.
"Give me the full picture."
Tiered analysis: top papers get deep extraction with credibility scoring and evidence grounding.
"I need an answer by Friday."
Top 50 papers, mid-tier analysis, executive brief. For urgent decisions and board prep.
"Is this claim actually true?"
Deep extraction, credibility assessment, and evidence grounding focused on a specific claim. For due diligence.
"Why do studies disagree about this?"
Structured analysis of conflicting findings with attribution to methodology, data, or context differences.
Once I've built your evidence base, follow-up questions are answered in minutes. Same corpus, new perspective, new report. No additional research cost.
| Dimension | Traditional Review | AI Summary | Evidensity Research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turnaround | 6–18 months | Minutes | 2–5 days |
| Papers analysed | 20–100 (manual) | Unknown | 300–2,000 |
| Source transparency | ✓ Full | ✗ None | ✓ Full audit trail |
| Verified source quotes | ✗ Rarely | ✗ Hallucination risk | ✓ Programmatic verification |
| Credibility assessment | ✓ Expert judgement | ✗ None | ✓ Per-paper scoring |
| Disagreement detection | Sometimes | ✗ No | ✓ Structured with attribution |
| Follow-up questions | New engagement | New prompt | Minutes, same evidence base |
| Interactive exploration | ✗ Static PDF | ✗ Single prompt | ✓ Q&A, sensitivity, evidence map |
| Exportable data | Text | CSV, BibTeX, RIS, HTML |
Every claim in every report is traceable to a specific paper, verified against source text, and scored for credibility. No black boxes.
Every claim linked to a specific paper with APA citation and verified source quote
Verified verbatim quotes, APA citations, credibility scores — no paraphrase, no hallucination
From 2-hour rapid response to comprehensive deep analysis with paper tiering
Send your research question to evidensity.research@gmail.com. Evidensity will scope the evidence landscape for free — no cost, no commitment.
Free landscape scan on your first question. No commitment.
Priced by depth of analysis, not by the hour. Scoped after the landscape scan.
Ongoing evidence support with multiple questions and priority turnaround.